Hearing in the Gyanvapi Masjid case will now be held in the Supreme Court tomorrow, this order was given to the trial court

The hearing in the Supreme Court in the Gyanvapi Masjid case has been adjourned till Friday. The Supreme Court has asked the trial court of Varanasi not to pass any order today. The hearing in the Gyanvapi Mosque case will now take place in the Supreme Court tomorrow i.e. on Friday at 3 pm. Earlier on May 17, the matter was heard in the Supreme Court. At the same time, the survey report of the Special Commissioner was presented in the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Varanasi. Let us inform that the Anjuman Intejamiya Masjid filed a petition in the Supreme Court challenging the decision of the Varanasi Court. The Varanasi court had ordered a videographic survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex.

हिंदू पक्ष के अनुरोध पर ज्ञानवापी मामले की सुनवाई सुप्रीम कोर्ट में कल तक टली। सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने निचली अदालत में आज होने वाली सुनवाई पर लगाई रोक। सुप्रीम कोर्ट मामले मे कल 3 बजे करेगा सुनवाई। हिन्दू पक्ष ने संबंधित वकील का स्वास्थ्य खराब होने की बात कही थी।@JagranNews

— Mala Dixit (@mdixitjagran) May 19, 2022

Supreme Court order

During the hearing, the court made an important order. The court directed the security of the place where the Shivling was found in the Gyanvapi Masjid. The court also said in its order that there would be no bar on Muslims to go to the mosque and offer prayers. The court also issued notice to the Hindu side on the petition of the Masjid Committee. However, the Supreme Court has turned down the demand of the Masjid Committee to stay the hearing of the lower court.

UP government asked for time

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appeared on behalf of the UP government on Tuesday. Tushar Mehta had sought time from the court to share complete information. After which the Supreme Court gave the date of Thursday. Tushar Mehta had said that Shivling has been found in the Vazukhana of the mosque in the survey and that place is for washing hands and feet.

Muslim side’s argument

The counsel for the Muslim side had said in his plea that how the premises could be sealed. He called the orders illegal. The lawyer had also said in the argument that it is like sealing the property without listening to us. You are also limiting the place of prayer in the mosque.