Supreme Court order in Gyanvapi Masjid case, Varanasi district judge to hear the case
Hearing in the Gyanvapi Masjid case of Varanasi was held in the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court ordered that the trial of worship inside the mosque be done by a district judge. The Varanasi district judge will decide on the mosque committee’s plea that the trial by the Hindu side is not maintainable and until then the interim order—protection of the Shivling area, free entry to Muslims for prayers—will continue. The court said that the district judge has a long experience of 25 years. The interest of all the parties will be ensured in this matter. Also said that it should not be understood that we are dismissing the matter. Our paths will be open for you in future as well.
The Supreme Court has ordered transfer of the Gyanvapi Masjid case to District Judge Varanasi. The Supreme Court has ordered that senior and experienced judicial officers of the Uttar Pradesh Judicial Service will hear the case.
Meanwhile, the interim order of the Supreme Court to protect the place of Shivling found in the mosque premises during the survey will remain in force.
Huzefa Ahmadi, senior advocate of the Masjid Committee, told the Supreme Court that all the orders passed by the trial court from the very beginning are capable of causing great public mischief.
The Supreme Court is hearing the petition of Anjuman Intejamiya Masjid Committee against the order of the Varanasi District Court. A videographic survey of the Gyanvapi Masjid complex adjacent to the famous Kashi Vishwanath temple in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh was directed.
Top court gave this order
The Supreme Court on Thursday ordered the trial court of Varanasi not to demolish the wall in front of Nandi. The court said that no order should be passed in the matter for the time being. At the same time, the apex court had also asked to postpone the hearing of this matter in the Varanasi court for Thursday. On the other hand, the Muslim side had opposed the postponement of the hearing. He said that if the hearing is postponed, then many more such cases can be filed in the country.
Hindu side filed its reply
Please tell that the petition in the court has been filed on behalf of the Muslim side. He says that there is no justification for conducting a survey in the mosque. At the same time, the Hindu side has also filed its reply on this today. Advocate Vishnu Jain, appearing for the Hindu side, told the Supreme Court that the Gyanvapi Masjid in Varanasi is not a mosque, as the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb did not pass any order to form a Waqf on this land to hand over the land to a Muslim or a body of Muslims. Was. The reply states that historians have confirmed that the Islamic ruler Aurangzeb issued an order on 9 April 1669 instructing his administration to demolish the temple of Lord Adi Visheshwar in Varanasi.
Survey report presented in trial court
Ajay Pratap Singh, the special assistant commissioner appointed by the Varanasi court, has presented the survey report in the trial court. The survey report is of 10-15 pages. Before presenting the report, Court Commissioner Vishal Singh told that the report has been given in a sealed cover in which the video chip has also been filed.
