Uttar Pradesh: ‘The one who tried to tie Keshav, he himself…’ BJP MLA came out in support of Keshav Maurya, also spoke on CM Yogi

CM Yogi Adityanath held a meeting with the MLAs of Meerut division on Thursday. After the meeting, Ghaziabad’s Loni MLA Nand Kishore Gurjar gave a shocking statement about Deputy CM Keshav Prasad Maurya. Regarding the question related to Keshav Prasad Maurya, Nand Kishore Gurjar said, ‘Duryodhan went to tie Keshav. He himself got dealt with. Whether that Keshav is in Dwapar or Kaliyug. Keshav ji is Keshav ji. 325 seats have come under his leadership. Keshav ji has his own charm. The organization is always big. If there is no organization, there will be no MLAs. How will the government be formed. In today’s time, the officer is the form of Duryodhan and he will be operated.’
Meetings of all the divisions are being held at the Chief Minister’s residence. There was also a meeting of our division. In that, an assessment was being made on the election results. How to strengthen our seats in the 2027 elections, where our margin has decreased. This meeting was held regarding the work there. Rumors were spread about reservation. CM Yogi listened to everyone on these issues and it was also told that in-charges will be appointed in the districts.’
He further said, ‘Some agents of Samajwadi Party who have been on lucrative posts, those officers who looted during the time of SP, our government has zero tolerance. They are not able to do corruption, so they tried their best to lose the election. Action will be taken against such officers and the Chief Minister asked for evidence against such officers so that they can be sent to jail. They can be suspended from their jobs but an MLA and MP speaking against an officer is enough.’
Loni MLA said, ‘There is such an officer in our area, far from removing him, the way he goes out, the road is cleared. No one can go ahead of him. There are all such officers who consider themselves officers of the British era. The Chief Minister will take necessary action against such officers.’