News Cubic Studio

Truth and Reality

Supreme Court refuses to ban compulsory vaccination

Notice to the Center on disclosure of trial figures

The Supreme Court, while hearing a petition on Monday, said that India already has a problem of hesitation regarding the corona virus vaccine, so there should be no message from the court about its efficacy.

A bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao and Hrishikesh Roy was hearing a petition filed by Jacob Puliyal, a former member of the National Technical Advisory Group, seeking disclosure of data on clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines. The petition also sought a direction to publicize the data on the adverse effects of the Kovid-19 vaccine on people, stating that the government was forcing people to take the vaccine. Although the Supreme Court refused to grant an interim stay on compulsory vaccination, it has issued notices to the Centre, the Ministry of Health, ICMR and vaccine manufacturers seeking their response regarding disclosure of trial data of the coronavirus vaccine. Hearing the petition, Justice L Nageswara Rao said, 50 crore people in the country have been given the vaccine.

Public health cannot be tampered with
The court said that you cannot tamper with public health like this. We have not seen such an epidemic in 100 years, so it is important to balance the vaccine in an emergency. Senior advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioner, said that this is neither an anti-vaccine petition nor the petitioner is seeking to stop the vaccination of Kovid in the country. Prashant Bhushan said there is a need for transparency in vaccine testing and the disclosure of the data will clear all doubts.

See also  The Union Cabinet, chaired by the Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi has approved anAgreement between the Republic of India and Saint Vincent and The Grenadines for the Exchange of Information and Assistance in Collection with respect to Taxes. Details of the Agreement: i) This is a new Agreement between the Republic of India and Saint Vincent and The Grenadines. There was no such agreement in past between the two countries. ii) Agreement mainly proposes to facilitate exchange of information between the two countries and to provide assistance to each other in collection of tax claims. iii) Agreement also contains tax examination abroad provisions which provide that a country may allow the representatives of the other country to enter its territory (to the extent permitted under its domestic laws) to interview individuals and examine records for tax purposes. Impact: Agreement between the Republic of India and Saint Vincent and The Grenadines will help in facilitating the exchange of information between the two countries including sharing of information held by the banks and other financial institutions encompassing the information regarding the legal and beneficial ownership. It will also facilitate the assistance in collection of the tax claims between the two countries. Thus, it will strengthen India's commitment to fight offshore tax evasion and tax avoidance practices leading to generation of unaccounted black money. Background: There was no such agreement with Saint Vincent and The Grenadines in the past and India was negotiating this agreement since a long time. Finally, Saint Vincent and The Grenadines agreed to conclude this agreement with India which will promote tax cooperation between the two countries through exchange of information and assistance in collection of outstanding tax claims between the two countries.

Demand not to be denied the facility
Quoting a recent sero-survey report, Prashant Bhushan said that at least two-thirds of people have been infected with COVID-19, which makes their antibodies more effective than the COVID vaccine. Prashant Bhushan said that many restrictions, including travel, have been imposed on those who have not received the vaccines. He said, since the vaccine is voluntary, so if one does not get the vaccine then the person should not be denied any facility.

Exit mobile version