Swara Bhaskar thanks the Supreme Court for the interim bail granted to Mohammad Zubair
Swara Bhaskar thanks Supreme Court for getting interim bail to Mohammad Zubair On July 20, the top court granted interim bail to Zubair in all the cases, saying it was not right to keep him in custody for an indefinite period. Sharing this news, Bollywood actress Swara Bhaskar has thanked the Supreme Court. After which the users started pulling him up.
Ishanka wrote, “Shiva ji had given a boon to Ravana too, but what happened later is known to all. No need to be happy.” Avinash Chander wrote, “Bail has been granted. Now the pages will open. Then the Librandus will have to cry with chest thumping.” A user named Dev wrote, “It is the same Supreme Court that gave relief to Nupur Sharma. Then the leftists and the rioters started feeling pain, didn’t they?”
Jaideep Makwana wrote, “The traitors call it that. Do anything, but by tweeting 2 rupees Kamalo by supporting the one who spread hatred. A user named Aayush wrote, “Well done, only then will he spread fake news. Otherwise who will give air to the head separated from the body. Prakash wrote, “Don’t worry, it will go back again. Because it won’t improve.
Thank you Supreme Court!
More power to you #VrindaGrover !
Onward and upward @zoo_bear
✨🙏🏽— Swara Bhasker (@ReallySwara) July 20, 2022
This is the case
Let us tell you that the Supreme Court has granted interim bail to Zubair on a personal bond of Rs 20 thousand. Mohammad Zubair appealed to the Supreme Court to quash all the 6 cases against him. Now the Supreme Court has asked Zubair to club all the six cases registered against him and transfer them to the Special Cell of Delhi Police. Apart from this, the SIT which was constituted to investigate the old tweets of Zubair, has also been dissolved by the Supreme Court.
The Uttar Pradesh government had filed a petition seeking a ban on Zubair’s tweets. To which Justice DY Chandrachud said that how can a journalist stop writing. If he does something that violates the law, then he is accountable to the law. But when a citizen is raising his voice, how can we take advance action against him?
