News Cubic Studio

Truth and Reality

Uttarakhand: Opposition made the extension of UPCL MD’s service an issue, the government’s decision will be reviewed!

In Uttarakhand, the Dhami government has given a two-year extension to UPCL MD Anil Yadav. The opposition is attacking the government on this issue. Let us tell you that serious allegations of corruption have been leveled against Yadav. In such a situation, discussions are not stopping in the political corridors regarding his extension of service.

Opposition made the extension of service of UPCL MD an issue

Politics is not stopping regarding the extension of service of UPCL MD Anil Yadav. Congress is continuously attacking against this decision of the government. Congress is trying to capitalize on this issue in the Kedarnath by-election. Congress has accused the government of protecting the corrupt. Congress leader Pritam Singh says that there is a lot of difference between the words and actions of the BJP regarding corruption. The government is protecting such officers who are accused of corruption.

BJP leaders also called the extension of service wrong

On the other hand, not only the opposition but also the leaders of the ruling party themselves are raising questions on the decision of their government on this issue. Earlier, BJP MLA Vinod Chamoli had called Anil Yadav’s extension wrong, while now BJP state president Mahendra Bhatt says that this decision should be reviewed. Bhatt says that a better and more capable officer could have got a chance on this post. Who could have improved the functioning of UPCL.

The decision of service extension can be reviewed

In fact, Uttarakhand Power Corporation Limited (UPCL) MD Anil Yadav has been given a two-year extension by the Dhami government of the state. Anil Yadav has been in controversies during his tenure. There are many serious allegations of corruption against Yadav. Along with this, there is also an allegation of amassing assets disproportionate to income. In such a situation, getting an extension of service to a controversial officer raises many questions in itself.